In 1939, an orphanage in Iowa, USA, became the site of a harrowing psychological transgression. Children under the age of five were selected as subjects in a brutal experiment designed to induce stuttering. This episode delves into the depths of the “Monster Study,” revealing how this research violated ethical boundaries in psychology, leaving profound psychological scars on the affected children. We will explore how the repercussions of this experiment continue to influence the foundations of modern scientific research.

Before we examine the details of this appalling psychological transgression, please share your expectations in the comments section. To accompany us on this exploration of shocking truths, please subscribe to the channel.

Wendell Johnson: The Architect of the Study

Prior to the orphanage in Davenport becoming the scene of this horrific experiment, there was an ambitious psychologist named Wendell Johnson. In 1933, Johnson earned his doctorate from the University of Iowa, a milestone achieved despite his lifelong struggle with stuttering. This personal challenge served not only as an obstacle but also as the catalyst for his deep interest in understanding this complex phenomenon. In the 1930s, scientific understanding of stuttering was still evolving. Johnson’s research focused on exploring the potential etiologies of stuttering, including genetic, environmental, and psychological factors.

However, he soon adopted a unique and assertive perspective, positing that stuttering might not be an inherent organic condition but rather a consequence of misdiagnosis and negative treatment of children experiencing speech difficulties. He theorized that a child struggling with articulation, when met with negative reactions, might experience increased anxiety and tension, thereby exacerbating the problem. This conviction led him to formulate a daring hypothesis: Could psychological stress and misdiagnosis induce stuttering in children with normal speech? To investigate this question, Johnson initiated the infamous “Monster Study” in 1939. Under his direct supervision, Mary Tudor, a graduate student, conducted the ill-fated experiment in the orphanage, transforming the lives of these innocent children into a terrifying ordeal.

The Experiment Unfolds

After this diabolical concept took hold, Johnson and his team began implementing their plan. The Iowa orphanage, a sanctuary for 22 innocent children, was transformed into a site of psychological manipulation. Unaware of their impending fate, these children were divided into two groups: a “normal” group and a “stuttering” group. Tragically, all the children possessed normal speech prior to the commencement of this experiment. Wendell Johnson, the architect of this inhumane study, and Clarissa Kidwell, the graduate student involved in its execution, could not have foreseen the devastating impact it would have.

Children in the “stuttering” group were subjected to relentless criticism and harsh reprimands. The notion that they suffered from serious speech defects was instilled in their young minds, and they were instructed to cease speaking in that “shameful” manner. Every minor speech imperfection was met with a hurtful insult, planting seeds of fear and anxiety in their vulnerable hearts. Conversely, children in the “normal” group received standard treatment, without any negative commentary on their speech. This disparity in treatment created a psychologically oppressive environment, where anxiety and fear became constant companions for the children in the “stuttering” group. This constituted systematic cruelty perpetrated in the name of science.

The Immediate and Lasting Consequences

The immediate consequences were devastating, leaving indelible marks on the children’s innocence. Following the experiment, these children were irrevocably changed; the joy had been extinguished from their eyes. Manifestations of anxiety and tension were evident, as if a dark cloud had descended upon their young souls, robbing them of their purity and innocence. They became more cautious and withdrawn in social interactions, carefully considering each word before speaking, fearing that it might trigger further rebuke, consuming what remained of their fragile confidence. Subsequent studies revealed the extent of the profound psychological damage they endured, damage that had become deeply ingrained. Those misdiagnosed as stutterers suffered from low self-esteem and a negative self-image. Their self-perception was distorted, and they began to view themselves as flawed and inadequate, a burden on the world. The pervasive fear of ridicule or criticism led some to avoid speaking altogether in public settings. Silence became their refuge, albeit a silence filled with suffering, a silence that spoke volumes of deep-seated pain. Their distress manifested in various forms, including compulsive nervous habits, such as nail-biting or leg-shaking, as an involuntary response to the persistent tension and anxiety that accompanied them. Even their dreams were affected, as psychological records documented a significant increase in the incidence of nightmares and insomnia, as if their young minds were replaying the horrific experiment repeatedly in the darkness of night.

Haunted by the Past

Interviews conducted years later revealed a deep, unhealed wound. Mary Tudor, for example, could not escape the specter of stuttering, even after the conclusion of the experiment. The fear of public speaking remained a persistent nightmare, depriving her of opportunities in her professional and personal life. William Tudor, her brother, chose to withdraw from the world, preferring isolation to facing pity or ridicule. The shame and confusion instilled by the experiment transformed into a suffocating solitary confinement, where he spent his days alone, grappling with painful memories. A follow-up study conducted in 2001 revealed alarming statistics: levels of anxiety and depression among participants misdiagnosed as stutterers were significantly higher than in others. The nightmares of the experiment continued to haunt them decades later, renewing their suffering and reminding them of those horrific moments. George Barr, one of Wendell Johnson’s assistants, later expressed deep regret for his role in the experiment, describing it as a stigma that would forever mark him. Some were unable to form healthy relationships, as the trauma experienced in childhood left lasting scars, hindering their ability to trust others and engage in intimate relationships.

Reckoning and Apology

George Barr was not the only one burdened by the weight of that heinous experiment. Decades of silence passed before the details of the “Monster Study” were revealed, shocking the public with its brutality. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the underlying resentment erupted. Mary Tudor, the child falsely labeled as a stutterer, finally broke her silence, revealing her story of suffering. Her account ignited empathy and criticism. In 2001, the University of Iowa issued an official apology, acknowledging that the “Monster Study” was a regrettable and unethical act. However, this apology was insufficient to quell public outrage. Eliza Ambrose Rosenthal, a bioethicist, described the experiment as “a flagrant violation of human rights,” a statement that resonated within the scientific community and awakened dormant consciences. In 2003, after legal proceedings, six of the affected orphans received financial compensation from the state of Iowa, in recognition of the severe damage they had suffered. An investigation by the San Jose Mercury News revealed Wendell Johnson’s prior concern about the potential exposure of his experiment, confirming that the motivation behind the study was not the pursuit of knowledge but ambition and the desire for recognition.

Aftermath and Legacy

Even after decades, the wound remained deep and unhealed. In 2001, the University of Iowa took a belated step toward acknowledging the atrocity that had been committed. An official apology, described by the university’s president at the time, Mary Sue Coleman, as regrettable and unacceptable, was issued to erase the stigma that tarnished the reputation of the institution. In the same year, a financial settlement was reached with six of the living victims, a sum of $925,000 paid by the state of Iowa due to the university’s lack of insurance against such lawsuits. The apology was not entirely explicit, as the university avoided directly acknowledging responsibility for the permanent psychological damage. However, the financial settlement represented an implicit admission of guilt. Initially, the settlement included a confidentiality clause, an attempt to silence the victims. However, this clause was later lifted, allowing them to share their stories. Ironically, a scholarship was established in the name of Wendell Johnson, the architect of the experiment, but its name was quickly changed.

Years after the silence, the echoes of the “Monster Study” returned to reverberate within the scientific community, prompting a re-evaluation of research practices. The University of Iowa’s apology in 2001, while insufficient to repair the damage inflicted upon the orphaned children, marked a turning point in scientific research ethics. In 1974, the National Research Act for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research was enacted in the United States, legislation designed to safeguard the rights and welfare of individuals participating in federally funded research. This law, a response to the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and other unethical experiments, established standards for scientific research and required research institutions to obtain informed

Video

Images