Did you know that Julius Caesar’s last words may not have been “Et tu, Brute?” but something else entirely? In this episode, we delve into history to debunk some of the most famous and deeply ingrained quotations. We’ll explore the origins of these linguistic myths and uncover what was truly said during those pivotal moments. Before we begin this exploration, share your predictions in the comments. To stay informed about our future discoveries, subscribe to our documentary channel.

The Truth About Caesar’s Demise

So, did Julius Caesar actually utter the famous words, “Et tu, Brute?” as he died? Historical records reveal a more complex and surprising truth. Contrary to popular belief, there is no reliable contemporary historical evidence to confirm that Caesar spoke this phrase, or anything similar, in his final moments. Plutarch, writing over a century after Caesar’s death, suggests a different account. He mentions that Caesar may have said in Latin, “καὶ σὺ τέκνον” – “You too, my child?” or perhaps he remained silent, allowing his fate to speak for itself. Suetonius, another historian, offers a similar possibility, suggesting that Caesar may have simply let out a sigh.

Shakespeare’s Influence

Where, then, did the immortal phrase we know today originate? The answer lies in Shakespeare’s literary genius. His play, “Julius Caesar,” written around 1599, cemented “Et tu, Brute?” in popular memory. Shakespeare portrayed this moment of betrayal with unparalleled dramatic power, but his depiction wasn’t necessarily an accurate reflection of historical reality. Brutus was considered by Caesar as an adopted son or a beloved, which heightens the drama surrounding the supposed betrayal, making its impact even more poignant. The quote, whether authentic or fabricated, often brilliantly captures a pivotal historical moment, a moment where the symbol becomes more powerful and entrenched than reality itself.

Marie Antoinette: Let Them Eat Cake?

Now, let’s turn to another victim of historical distortion: Marie Antoinette. “Let them eat cake!” This scathing phrase encapsulates the perceived extravagance of the French queen and her detachment from the suffering of her people. But did she actually utter these words? The truth, as always, is more complex and intriguing. Surprisingly, these words attributed to Marie Antoinette appeared many years before she rose to power. They are found in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Confessions,” written around 1765, when Marie Antoinette was still a young child. There is no conclusive evidence directly linking her to this infamous phrase. Rather, it is believed that it was circulating and common before her time, and was attributed to other French princesses. So, how did this slander become specifically associated with Marie Antoinette? This is where the insidious role of malicious propaganda comes into play. During the height of the French Revolution, this phrase was used as a potent weapon to defame her and portray her as an arrogant woman indifferent to the extreme poverty suffered by the people. Although her personal letters and correspondence reveal her genuine concern and her relentless efforts to support the poor and needy, the false stereotype had already taken root in the public consciousness.

Patrick Henry: Liberty or Death

While the image of Marie Antoinette as an arrogant woman became entrenched, let’s now move on to another figure, albeit in a completely different historical context: Patrick Henry. “Give me liberty, or give me death!” A resounding cry that has echoed through the centuries, but what was the actual context in which these earth-shattering words were uttered? On March 23, 1775, crowds gathered at St. John’s Church in Richmond, Virginia, to discuss the fate of the colony. The crucial question facing them: Should Virginia prepare for the impending war with Great Britain? Amid this atmosphere charged with anticipation, the voice of Patrick Henry, a prominent member of the House of Burgesses, rang out with a fiery speech that awakened dormant emotions. The painful irony lies in the fact that the exact text of this historic speech was not recorded at the time. What we know today relies heavily on the memoirs of William Wirt, Henry’s biographer, who reconstructed the speech many years after the event. But even with these limitations, the profound impact of Henry’s speech remains undeniable. This was not the first time Henry had confronted the authority of the British Crown. A decade earlier, he had bravely opposed the Stamp Act of 1765. But in 1775, the context was broader and more dangerous: the escalating tensions between the colonies and Great Britain, which foreshadowed the imminent outbreak of the War of Independence. His words were not merely a call to arms, but a spark that ignited the fire of revolution in the hearts of the colonists, inspiring countless numbers to join the cause.

Sherlock Holmes: Elementary, My Dear Watson

After Patrick Henry’s words ignited the fuse of revolution, let’s move to another world, a world shrouded in mystery, where facts are often buried beneath layers of fiction and popular perceptions: Sherlock Holmes. Just mentioning the name immediately conjures up images of a deerstalker hat, Baker Street, and, of course, that famous phrase, “Elementary, my dear Watson.” But the astonishing surprise lies here: this phrase, which seems to be the essence of Holmes’s character, never came out of the detective’s mouth in Arthur Conan Doyle’s original stories. These words never appeared in any of Holmes’s written adventures. The closest Doyle came was to use the word “elementary” frequently, or to address his close friend as “my dear Watson” on separate occasions. But that combination that we know and love… is completely absent. So how did this phrase become so firmly entrenched in our collective consciousness? Part of the credit goes to the writer P.G. Wodehouse, who is believed to be the first to use the complete phrase in his book “Psmith, Journalist” in 1915. But the greater credit goes to the actor William Gillette, who introduced similar phrases in his play “Sherlock Holmes” in 1899, contributing to its widespread dissemination and circulation. Then came the film “The Return of Sherlock Holmes” in 1929, where Clive Brook uttered that famous phrase, thereby sealing its association with the character cinematically. Thus, the phrase transformed from an incidental addition to an integral part of Sherlock Holmes’s image in popular culture, becoming a stark example of how misquotes can transcend facts and become an integral part of identity.

Voltaire: Misattributed Wisdom

And so, falsely attributed sayings intertwine with facts, forming a complex tapestry of misconceptions. This phenomenon is not limited to the fictional character of Sherlock Holmes; the French philosopher Voltaire, in turn, fell victim to this historical distortion, as he is often credited with sayings he never uttered, placing historians and researchers before a formidable challenge in their quest to delineate the boundaries of his original ideas. The famous phrase, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it,” for example, despite its close association with Voltaire, is actually the brainchild of Evelyn Beatrice Hall, who penned it in a biography of the philosopher in 1906. As for the saying, “If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him,” which is often attributed to him, its true origin remains shrouded in mystery, enveloped in fog. Voltaire’s overwhelming popularity and his prestigious intellectual standing contributed significantly to attributing many sayings to him, even those that blatantly contradict his stated philosophy. Often, the lines become blurred, and his ideas merge with those of his contemporaries from the Enlightenment era, further complicating matters and deepening the difficulty of identifying his authentic intellectual imprint. Studying Voltaire’s original works requires a strenuous effort to separate the wheat from the chaff, and to distinguish false sayings from his genuine writings.

The Psychology of Misquotes

But why do these false sayings become entrenched in our collective memory? The answer lies deep within the human psyche, in those gray areas where simplification meets deeply ingrained biases. False quotes often serve what psychologists call cognitive simplification. They are mental shortcuts, making it easier to understand complex historical events without delving into the fine details. Instead of absorbing the complexities of the Roman internal conflict, we settle for the phrase “Et tu, Brute?” to summarize betrayal and treachery. This cognitive simplification is reinforced by what is known as the illusory truth effect: simply repeating information, even if it is false, increases the likelihood of believing it. Over time, these false sayings become part of the collective memory, those shared knowledge and memories that shape our identity. It’s not just that, but confirmation bias plays a crucial role. A study by Stanford University showed that we tend to remember information that supports our preconceived beliefs better. Thus, false quotes that reinforce dominant narratives and serve the interests of certain groups in society become entrenched, becoming cultural memes that spread by imitation and repetition; it is an ongoing story, renewed in every generation.

The Media’s Role

And so the tale continues, but the question remains: how do false sayings become entrenched in our collective consciousness? Part of the answer lies in the immense power wielded by the media. Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar,” written in 1599, cemented the phrase “Et tu, Brute?” in collective memory, despite the absence of conclusive evidence that Caesar specifically uttered it. Shakespeare imbued that dramatic moment with a deep emotional dimension, making it etched in minds. Then came cinema to deepen the impact. The silent film “Julius Caesar” in 1914 contributed significantly to reinforcing the stereotype of Caesar’s assassination, influencing the public’s perception of the historical event. Later, Robert Graves’s novel “I, Claudius” and the television series adapted from it presented fictional interpretations of historical events, including Caesar’s assassination, further influencing public understanding. In 1953, Marlon Brando gave a moving cinematic performance in another

Video Explanation

Images